The human experiences

I think the reason for writing all these scentences, is that any worldview has to take a position towards any of these themes. It is, if objectivity exists, if they all have their place in reality. But we are only subjectively aware of the themes. As if we have to discover their place.

almost every intellectual has thought about their objective places in reality. From Plato to Locke, Freud, Kant, Lewis, Hitchins, Craig and maybe the youngest arrival O’connor, they all struggled with the place of what we cannot see, but experience.

Maybe the struggle of all these bright men with the themes are enough proof that they exist; maybe the relevant question is where do they exist?

Because of sight, I won’t be surprised if ‘that which we see’ really exists.

Because of sound, I won’t be surprised if ‘that which we hear’ really exists.

Because of scent, I won’t be surprised if ‘that which we smell’ really exists.

Because of taste, I won’t be surprised if ‘that which we savor’ really exists.

Because of touch, I won’t be surprised if ‘that which we feel physically’ really exists.

Because of emotions, I won’t be surprised if ‘our feelings’ really exist.

Because of thought, I won’t be surprised if ‘ideas and understanding’ really exist.

Because of memory, I won’t be surprised if ‘the past’ really exists.

Because of imagination, I won’t be surprised if ‘the future’ really exists.

Because of reason, I won’t be surprised if ‘logic and truth’ really exist.

Because of intuition, I won’t be surprised if ‘the subconscious’ really exists.

Because of language, I won’t be surprised if ‘meaning and communication’ really exist.

Because of purpose, I won’t be surprised if ‘that which is meaningful’ really exists.

Because of morality, I won’t be surprised if ‘right and wrong’ really exist.

Because of beauty, I won’t be surprised if ‘aesthetic value’ really exists.

Because of curiosity, I won’t be surprised if ‘the unknown’ really exists.

Because of existence itself, I won’t be surprised if ‘reality’ really exists.

Because of a higher order, I won’t be surprised if ‘divine will and cosmic harmony’ really exist.

Because of a higher purpose, I won’t be surprised if ‘a divine plan’ really exists.

Because of a higher morality, I won’t be surprised if ‘divine justice and ultimate truth’ really exist.

Because of suffering, I won’t be surprised if ‘redemption and salvation’ really exist.

Because of a higher love, I won’t be surprised if ‘the presence of a benevolent God’ really exists.

Because of miracles, I won’t be surprised if ‘supernatural intervention’ really exists.

Because of prayer, I won’t be surprised if ‘a listening and responsive deity’ really exists.

Because of sacred texts, I won’t be surprised if ‘divine revelation’ really exists.

Because of faith, I won’t be surprised if ‘a deeper spiritual reality’ really exists.

Because of conscience, I won’t be surprised if ‘a moral lawgiver’ really exists.

Because of order in the universe, I won’t be surprised if ‘an intelligent design’ really exists.

Because of the soul, I won’t be surprised if ‘an eternal afterlife’ really exists.

Because of spiritual experiences, I won’t be surprised if ‘a transcendent reality’ really exists.

Because of good and evil, I won’t be surprised if ‘a cosmic struggle’ really exists.

Because of longing for eternity, I won’t be surprised if ‘heaven’ really exists.

Because of resurrection, I won’t be surprised if ‘life after death’ really exists.

Because of a higher judgment, I won’t be surprised if ‘a final judgment and ultimate justice’ really exist.

Because of the unity of all things, I won’t be surprised if ‘a source from which all emanates’ really exists.

Explore similar topics

  1. Where faith begins
  2. The (in)significance of religion
  3. Christianity’s best argument

Plaats een reactie